Comments for News the Stars Bring Today http://starmaker.today.com Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:44:12 +0000 http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1 Comment on Vrajavala by billyo http://starmaker.today.com/about/#comment-531 billyo Sat, 14 Nov 2009 03:53:03 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/about/#comment-531 Are you kidding? There is NO provision in the Health care bill that forces doctors to perform abortions. You are a phony and a liar, and the reason that this country is in shreds. Go ahead and secede, who needs your lies and misinformation? Are you kidding? There is NO provision in the Health care bill that forces doctors to perform abortions.

You are a phony and a liar, and the reason that this country is in shreds. Go ahead and secede, who needs your lies and misinformation?

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by Brad P. http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-527 Brad P. Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:35:19 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-527 For secession to be succesful, you don't need any rights guaranteed to you by the Constitution. If a state, say Texas, votes to secede from the Union, the ONLY challenge that the Federal government could make is either a political one (isolation, pressure on foreign governments to not recognize Texas as a country, embargo, etc.) or a military one. But the reality is that, in this present day, any military action would be broadcast across the world and repeated on every possible medium ad nauseum. The second that a soldier of the Federal government shot at a former U.S. citizen, the power and legitimacy of the government would disappear. Anyone can see that the person getting shot could have been from any state, any community. The country would be divided between those that sympathize with the secessionists and those that demand that all states remain with the Union. As soon as it is demonstrated that your government can and will kill you if you disagree with it, whether or not secession is legal, the Union will have been dissolved. For secession to be succesful, you don’t need any rights guaranteed to you by the Constitution. If a state, say Texas, votes to secede from the Union, the ONLY challenge that the Federal government could make is either a political one (isolation, pressure on foreign governments to not recognize Texas as a country, embargo, etc.) or a military one. But the reality is that, in this present day, any military action would be broadcast across the world and repeated on every possible medium ad nauseum. The second that a soldier of the Federal government shot at a former U.S. citizen, the power and legitimacy of the government would disappear. Anyone can see that the person getting shot could have been from any state, any community. The country would be divided between those that sympathize with the secessionists and those that demand that all states remain with the Union. As soon as it is demonstrated that your government can and will kill you if you disagree with it, whether or not secession is legal, the Union will have been dissolved.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by Aradaw http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-512 Aradaw Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:25:53 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-512 is there any article mentioned in the constitution which insures secession request of by any of the USA states if requested how does it get implemented? procedures? I am just curious about the bill of right of states and their people? is there any article mentioned in the constitution which insures secession request of by any of the USA states if requested how does it get implemented? procedures?

I am just curious about the bill of right of states and their people?

]]> Comment on Vrajavala by Salve, sancta parens http://starmaker.today.com/about/#comment-492 Salve, sancta parens Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:45:29 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/about/#comment-492 Hi Vrajavala, Your blog is impressive: concise, objective, well referenced, clear, and a breath of fresh air to read the truth. You bring a whole new perspective to the latest events. Thanks for an educated and honorable presentation. I'll be sure to visit again. Hi Vrajavala,

Your blog is impressive: concise, objective, well referenced, clear, and a breath of fresh air to read the truth. You bring a whole new perspective to the latest events. Thanks for an educated and honorable presentation. I’ll be sure to visit again.

]]> Comment on Comanche Leader Dr. David Yeagley Says “It’s Time To Impeach Obama” by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-462 vrajavala Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:23:07 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-462 Max, I think you meant to write Deists, not Diests. And secular has the same meaning as you are writing about. In any case "One Nation, under God, Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." Max, I think you meant to write Deists, not Diests. And secular has the same meaning as you are writing about. In any case “One Nation, under God, Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

]]> Comment on Comanche Leader Dr. David Yeagley Says “It’s Time To Impeach Obama” by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-455 vrajavala Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:56:39 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-455 I'm not ignoring the "facts". I believe there was no atheists among the founding fathers, just a couple of "secularist. And, as I said we do have an amendment process. I’m not ignoring the “facts”. I believe there was no atheists among the founding fathers, just a couple of “secularist. And, as I said we do have an amendment process.

]]> Comment on Comanche Leader Dr. David Yeagley Says “It’s Time To Impeach Obama” by maxdoubt http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-451 maxdoubt Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:25:54 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-451 LOL constitution based on xtian values. Never mind the Diest views of so many of the founding fathers... Its wonderful to have an idealistic view of history and ignore the facts. LOL constitution based on xtian values. Never mind the Diest views of so many of the founding fathers… Its wonderful to have an idealistic view of history and ignore the facts.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-314 vrajavala Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:04:09 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-314 Some have suggested that, since the Obamacare is the same as Hitler's Tiergarten death policy, that Obama should be impeached for promoting it. After all the "doctors" and people behind the euthanasia of the Tiergarten policy were tried by Nuremberg and hung. He has been rebuked by congress once, and needs more rebukes for trampling on the constitution, or he needs to get out of the country. Some have suggested that, since the Obamacare is the same as Hitler’s Tiergarten death policy, that Obama should be impeached for promoting it. After all the “doctors” and people behind the euthanasia of the Tiergarten policy were tried by Nuremberg and hung.
He has been rebuked by congress once, and needs more rebukes for trampling on the constitution, or he needs to get out of the country.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-301 vrajavala Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:45:31 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-301 I have heard that some states, like alaska joined and made certain requirements for it to remain in the Union. I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but I believe that the sovereignity clause or 10th Amedment keeps the federal government from infringing upon the state'sn ability to govern itself. I have heard that some states, like alaska joined and made certain requirements for it to remain in the Union. I’m not a Constitutional scholar, but I believe that the sovereignity clause or 10th Amedment keeps the federal government from infringing upon the state’sn ability to govern itself.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by wharton http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-300 wharton Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:52:02 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-300 It will not occur. There will be no secession. The tenth amendment was a 'catch all' for rights the authors overlooked. It does not, in fact, mean very much of anything. The real issue is: elections have consequences. The GOP have lost two consequtive federal elections. There will be another in 2010. The GOp needs to get its' act together. There is no right to secede. There was no right to secede in 1860. It will not occur. There will be no secession. The tenth amendment was a ‘catch all’ for rights the authors overlooked. It does not, in fact, mean very much of anything.
The real issue is: elections have consequences. The GOP have lost two consequtive federal elections. There will be another in 2010. The GOp needs to get its’ act together.
There is no right to secede. There was no right to secede in 1860.

]]>