Comments for News the Stars Bring Today http://starmaker.today.com Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:00:50 +0000 http://www.today.com/version-2.3.1 Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by Aradaw http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-512 Aradaw Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:25:53 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-512 is there any article mentioned in the constitution which insures secession request of by any of the USA states if requested how does it get implemented? procedures? I am just curious about the bill of right of states and their people? is there any article mentioned in the constitution which insures secession request of by any of the USA states if requested how does it get implemented? procedures?

I am just curious about the bill of right of states and their people?

]]> Comment on Vrajavala by Salve, sancta parens http://starmaker.today.com/about/#comment-492 Salve, sancta parens Mon, 19 Oct 2009 04:45:29 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/about/#comment-492 Hi Vrajavala, Your blog is impressive: concise, objective, well referenced, clear, and a breath of fresh air to read the truth. You bring a whole new perspective to the latest events. Thanks for an educated and honorable presentation. I'll be sure to visit again. Hi Vrajavala,

Your blog is impressive: concise, objective, well referenced, clear, and a breath of fresh air to read the truth. You bring a whole new perspective to the latest events. Thanks for an educated and honorable presentation. I’ll be sure to visit again.

]]> Comment on Comanche Leader Dr. David Yeagley Says “It’s Time To Impeach Obama” by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-462 vrajavala Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:23:07 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-462 Max, I think you meant to write Deists, not Diests. And secular has the same meaning as you are writing about. In any case "One Nation, under God, Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." Max, I think you meant to write Deists, not Diests. And secular has the same meaning as you are writing about. In any case “One Nation, under God, Indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

]]> Comment on Comanche Leader Dr. David Yeagley Says “It’s Time To Impeach Obama” by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-455 vrajavala Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:56:39 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-455 I'm not ignoring the "facts". I believe there was no atheists among the founding fathers, just a couple of "secularist. And, as I said we do have an amendment process. I’m not ignoring the “facts”. I believe there was no atheists among the founding fathers, just a couple of “secularist. And, as I said we do have an amendment process.

]]> Comment on Comanche Leader Dr. David Yeagley Says “It’s Time To Impeach Obama” by maxdoubt http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-451 maxdoubt Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:25:54 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/09/19/comanche-leader-dr-david-yeagley-says-its-time-to-impeach-obama/#comment-451 LOL constitution based on xtian values. Never mind the Diest views of so many of the founding fathers... Its wonderful to have an idealistic view of history and ignore the facts. LOL constitution based on xtian values. Never mind the Diest views of so many of the founding fathers… Its wonderful to have an idealistic view of history and ignore the facts.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-314 vrajavala Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:04:09 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-314 Some have suggested that, since the Obamacare is the same as Hitler's Tiergarten death policy, that Obama should be impeached for promoting it. After all the "doctors" and people behind the euthanasia of the Tiergarten policy were tried by Nuremberg and hung. He has been rebuked by congress once, and needs more rebukes for trampling on the constitution, or he needs to get out of the country. Some have suggested that, since the Obamacare is the same as Hitler’s Tiergarten death policy, that Obama should be impeached for promoting it. After all the “doctors” and people behind the euthanasia of the Tiergarten policy were tried by Nuremberg and hung.
He has been rebuked by congress once, and needs more rebukes for trampling on the constitution, or he needs to get out of the country.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-301 vrajavala Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:45:31 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-301 I have heard that some states, like alaska joined and made certain requirements for it to remain in the Union. I'm not a Constitutional scholar, but I believe that the sovereignity clause or 10th Amedment keeps the federal government from infringing upon the state'sn ability to govern itself. I have heard that some states, like alaska joined and made certain requirements for it to remain in the Union. I’m not a Constitutional scholar, but I believe that the sovereignity clause or 10th Amedment keeps the federal government from infringing upon the state’sn ability to govern itself.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by wharton http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-300 wharton Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:52:02 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-300 It will not occur. There will be no secession. The tenth amendment was a 'catch all' for rights the authors overlooked. It does not, in fact, mean very much of anything. The real issue is: elections have consequences. The GOP have lost two consequtive federal elections. There will be another in 2010. The GOp needs to get its' act together. There is no right to secede. There was no right to secede in 1860. It will not occur. There will be no secession. The tenth amendment was a ‘catch all’ for rights the authors overlooked. It does not, in fact, mean very much of anything.
The real issue is: elections have consequences. The GOP have lost two consequtive federal elections. There will be another in 2010. The GOp needs to get its’ act together.
There is no right to secede. There was no right to secede in 1860.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by vrajavala http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-296 vrajavala Fri, 31 Jul 2009 01:20:01 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-296 yes quite a few states have signed States Rights Resolutions in the last few months. Texas governor, rick Perry is very adamant about protecting Texas from Federal infringement. Sarah palin signed a resolution before she left office. yes quite a few states have signed States Rights Resolutions in the last few months. Texas governor, rick Perry is very adamant about protecting Texas from Federal infringement. Sarah palin signed a resolution before she left office.

]]> Comment on States Rights, 10th Amendment & Secessionist Movement 2009 by DeNeece Butler http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-295 DeNeece Butler Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:08:05 +0000 http://starmaker.today.com/2009/02/05/states-rights-10th-amendment-secessionist-movement/#comment-295 When we heard about AIG and others being "too big to fail", it brought to mind something I have long held. The United States of America is just too damned big! And, too diverse for effective central governance. The culture, resources and challenges of the southeastern US are different from that of the northeast, or the northwest, or central, etc. I have always thought it would be a good idea to divide this country up into five or six sections that would associate itself only with a national government state department and defense department and their budgets, and then, only to the degree that the people of those sections agree to subsidize their budgets. Being a Southerner, I am particularly interested in secession for the southern states, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, with our own constitution that is an addendem, so to speak, of the US Constitution, and our own addendems to the Bill of Rights. From a social standpoint, education, health care, etc., we run our own affairs, with rules and regulations agreed to by the people. Does anyone know of any group or organization that is dedicated to this proposal? If so, please let me know. I'd like to see if what they are proposing makes any sense to me and determine whether or not I would wish to associate myself with it. Down here in the South, a frequently invoked sentiment is, "Save yo Confedrit money, Boys; the South's gonna rise agin!" We are unique and distinctive in our resources and challenges. We have the ability to govern ourselves in a manner that better addresses our uniqueness than to be caught up in the broad brush approach that deals with us the same way all other parts of the country are governed, and the same can be said for all those other parts. DeNeece Butler When we heard about AIG and others being “too big to fail”, it brought to mind something I have long held. The United States of America is just too damned big! And, too diverse for effective central governance. The culture, resources and challenges of the southeastern US are different from that of the northeast, or the northwest, or central, etc. I have always thought it would be a good idea to divide this country up into five or six sections that would associate itself only with a national government state department and defense department and their budgets, and then, only to the degree that the people of those sections agree to subsidize their budgets.

Being a Southerner, I am particularly interested in secession for the southern states, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Georgia, Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, with our own constitution that is an addendem, so to speak, of the US Constitution, and our own addendems to the Bill of Rights. From a social standpoint, education, health care, etc., we run our own affairs, with rules and regulations agreed to by the people.

Does anyone know of any group or organization that is dedicated to this proposal? If so, please let me know. I’d like to see if what they are proposing makes any sense to me and determine whether or not I would wish to associate myself with it.

Down here in the South, a frequently invoked sentiment is, “Save yo Confedrit money, Boys; the South’s gonna rise agin!” We are unique and distinctive in our resources and challenges. We have the ability to govern ourselves in a manner that better addresses our uniqueness than to be caught up in the broad brush approach that deals with us the same way all other parts of the country are governed, and the same can be said for all those other parts.

DeNeece Butler

]]>