Mar 07 2009
Historical Precedents for Quo Warranto Removal of Federally Elected Officers

Albert Gallatin
As many of you know, Leo donofrio hs been researching the “Writ of Quo warranto”, and, fortunately, one of his readers, Kamira, knew that this statute had been used before in American History.according to books.google, there were two federal officers removed; actually their elections were declared “void”. They were not even listed in the Senate Register, so their whole elections were considered “fictitious.” Albert Gallatine was elected to the Senate, but had not lived the requisite nine years in the US, so his seat was declared vacant and his election voided. Gallantine also acted in other federal offices later, and was Secretary of the Treasury from 1801-14
The other precedent is Senator James Shields, who was “removed by the Senate after it was discovered that he was an alien by birth, and that when he was elected in January 1849 - from the State of Illinois, to serve as a US Senator - he had not been a US citizen for the requisite nine years.” They were both considered “usurpers.” In Shields’ case, however, the Democratic Governor called a special session of the legislature and he was then elected at that point. In the general election, he had been a naturalized citizen for 8 1/2 yrs only, but, by the time the special session was convened, he had the requisite nine years.
Therefore, it is entirely in the Public’s and Obama’s interest that his matter be cleared up. So far, he has hired three law firms and spent hundreds of thousands of dollars avoiding showing his “long form birth certificate,” which is certainly not the transparency he promised. He said “Through transparency comes legitimacy”
According to Natural Born Citizen “If Congress can remove a usurper to the Senate without expelling him, this provides evidence that Congress can remove a usurper to the Presidency without impeaching him.”




