News the Stars Bring Today

&
 

Dec 20 2008

Blagojevich: A Man of Character? Astrological Analysis

Published by vrajavala at 8:21 pm under astrology, politics Edit This

blagonixon.jpg
Okay, let’s take a common person’s observation of the Blagojevich scandal. He’s being compared to Richard Nixon, and, apparently, in the 80’s was even an ardent fan of Richard Nixon. On this past Friday, December 19th, he made a statement quoting Rudyard Kipling and fighting for the right to a fair trial. Since he is a former Prosecutor, he knows he has that right, in spite of the prevailing lynch mob.

Now, let’s look at a little of his biography for a few answers. He is a self-made man, whose parents immigrated from Serbia in 1947, which means that he wasn’t born with a silver spoon in his mouth. In fact, on the contrary, he worked some very menial jobs as a teenager and college student to support himself and his family: shoeshine boy, pizza boy, meat-packer and dishwasher. 

Of course, we know he was a Congressman in Illinois for two terms before he ran for the Governorship and won it in 2003, and again in 2007.

Contrast that background with some of the other players in the scandal: Rahm Emmanuel, son of a prominent doctor and former Zionist terrorist, and Barack Obama, whose meteoric rise to fame is totally inexplicable and about whom Americans know nothing. We don’t know if Barack Obama worked a day in his life, certainly never as a shoeshine boy, pizza delivery boy or as a dishwasher.

To me, there appears to be some character in this man called “Blago,” even though he seems to have 2 rather odd heroes: Elvis Presley and Richard Nixon. He may have idolized Nixon because he was also a man who brought himself up by the “bootstraps.” Famously, Elvis Presley also made a visit to Richard Nixon to express his support and admiration. I’m sure I’m not the first one to notice that Elvis and Rod have the same haircut.

Astrological profile: I have been practicing astrology for about 25 yrs and during that time, I have noticed that there are certain astrological indications for a politician. Namely, there is either a conjunction of the planet Mercury and Mars, or they aspect each other. What does that mean? It means that the person will be able to “twist the truth” and be a good liar, politician or diplomat.

Now, you will find this astrological factor in the chart of Barack Obama and Rahm Emmanuel, Patrick Fitzgerald, Hillary and Bill, Richard Nixon, but not in the chart of Rod Blagojevich, or Abraham Lincoln. Rather surprising, actually, but I think that Chicago politics is a little like “pin the tail on the donkey.” And, if people think they can get away with something they will try.

Another  thing about the whole Blagojevich “sting operation” was the glaring attempt on the part of Fitzgerald to create a “media event” in the indictment on December 9th. It was rather ludicrous to arrest the Governor at his home at 6 AM, as if he were attempting to be a fugitive. A simple call to his lawyers would have sufficed to put the Governor on notice.

So, to me, that casts an aspersion on Fitzgerald and what were his political motives? Does he have any? His tenure as US Attorney is over in 2009, and his continuance is now in the hands and good will of Barack Obama. Then there is the lack of an actual crime,  just a lot of m*****f*cking words on the phone. And the co-conspirators have not been named, even now, 11 days later. As Blagojevich said, something doesn’t smell right.

As Yid with a Lid suggested, possibly the best thing would be for Blagojevich to give the seat to Caroline Kennedy, to continue the level of inexperience of that particular senatorial seat.  Sure, she would be a carpetbagger, but so wasn’t Hillary.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.